Image Forgery Detection Using Neural Network In Python

AUTHOR(S)

K. Dhanunjayudu, Sabiha Dudekula, Sammatha Gowd Pallavi, Gandhudi Neethu, Vutakonda Bijje Ramakrishna, Jayavaram Naga Jyothi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46647/ijetms.2023.v07i02.043

ABSTRACT
The advancements of technology in every aspect of the current age are leading to the misuse of data. Researchers, therefore, face the challenging task of identifying these manipulated forms of data and distinguishing the real data from the manipulated. Splicing is one of the most common techniques used for digital image tampering; a selected area copied from the same or another image is pasted in an image. Image forgery detection is considered a reliable way to verify the authenticity of digital images. In this study, we proposed an approach based on the state-of-the-art deep learning architecture of ResNet50v2. The proposed model takes image batches as input and utilizes the weights of a YOLO convolutional neural network (CNN) by using the architecture of ResNet50v2. In this study, we used the CASIA_v1 and CASIA_v2 benchmark datasets, which contain two distinct categories, original and forgery, to detect image splicing. We used 80% of the data for the training and the remaining 20% for testing purposes. We also performed a comparative analysis between existing approaches and our proposed system. We evaluated the performance of our technique with the CASIA_v1 and CASIA_v2 datasets. Since the CASIA_v2 dataset is more comprehensive compared to the CASIA_v1 dataset, we obtained 99.3% accuracy for the fine-tuned model using transfer learning and 81% accuracy without transfer learning with the CASIA_v2 dataset. The results show the superiority of the proposed system

Page No: 349 - 359

References:

1. Fridrich, J.; Soukal, D.; Lukás, J. Detection of Copy-Move Forgery in Digital Images. Int. J. Comput. Sci. 2003, 3, 55–61.
2. Yerushalmy, I.; Hel-Or, H. Digital Image Forgery Detection Based on Lens and Sensor Aberration. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2011, 92, 71–91. [CrossRef]
3. Dirik, A.E.; Memon, N. Image tamper detection based on demosaicing artifacts. In Proceedings of the 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Cairo, Egypt, 7–10 November 2009; pp. 1497–1500. [CrossRef]
4. Christlein, V.; Riess, C.; Jordan, J.; Riess, C.; Angelopoulou, E. An Evaluation of Popular Copy-Move Forgery Detection Approaches. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2012, 7, 1841–1854. [CrossRef]
5. Zampoglou, M.; Papadopoulos, S.; Kompatsiaris, Y. Large-scale evaluation of splicing localization algorithms for web images. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2016, 76, 4801–4834. [CrossRef]
6. Varga, D. Multi-Pooled Inception Features for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2186. [CrossRef]
7. Kawahara, J.; Bentaieb, A.; Hamarneh, G. Deep features to classify skin lesions. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Prague, Czech Republic, 13–16 April 2016; pp. 1397–1400.
8. Bai, X.; Yang, M.; Huang, T.; Dou, Z.; Yu, R.; Xu, Y. Deep-Person: Learning discriminative deep features for person Re-Identification. Pattern Recognit. 2020, 98, 107036. [CrossRef]
9. Dong, J.; Wang, W.; Tan, T. CASIA Image Tampering Detection Evaluation Database. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE China Summit and International Conference on Signal and Information Processing, Beijing, China, 6–10 July 2013.
10. Mahdian, B.; Saic, S. A bibliography on blind methods for identifying image forgery. Signal Process. Image Commun. 2010, 25, 389–399. [CrossRef]
11. Farid, H. Image forgery detection. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2009, 26, 16–25. [CrossRef]
12. Lanh, T.V.; Chong, K.; Emmanuel, S.; Kankanhalli, M.S. A Survey on Digital Camera Image Forensic Methods. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Beijing, China, 2–5 July 2007; pp. 16–19. [CrossRef]
13. Barad, Z.; Goswami, M. Image Forgery Detection using Deep Learning: A Survey. In Proceedings of the 2020 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), Coimbatore, India, 6–7 March 2020; pp. 571–576.
14. Wu, Y.; Abd-Almageed, W.; Natarajan, P. BusterNet: Detecting Copy-Move Image Forgery with Source/Target Localization. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2018; pp. 170–186.
15. Manjunatha, S.; Patil, M.M. Deep learning-based Technique for Image Tamper Detection. In Proceedings of the 2021 Third International Conference on Intelligent Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile Networks (ICICV), Tirunelveli, India

How to Cite This Article:
K. Dhanunjayudu, Sabiha Dudekula, Sammatha Gowd Pallavi, Gandhudi Neethu, Vutakonda Bijje Ramakrishna, Jayavaram Naga Jyothi . Image Forgery Detection Using Neural Network In Python . ijetms;7(2):349-359. DOI: 10.46647/ijetms.2023.v07i02.043