PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A BIPOLAR PLATE IN A FUEL CELL USING COMPUTER FLUID DYNAMICS STUDIES

AUTHOR(S)

K. Krishna Pandi, K. Ramesh, D. Kulandaivel, M. Shoban Babu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46647/ijetms.2023.v07i03.112

ABSTRACT
Over the past ten years, proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells have gained popularity as a potential energy source. PEM fuel cells are a high efficiency, environmentally friendly power source that are not constrained by Carnot efficiency. Due to its characteristics of zero emissions, high power density, rapid start-up, and low operating temperature, they are seen as one of the attractive options to be utilized for electric cars. In this project work, a fuel cell uses that a low cost bipolar plate material with a high fuel cell performance are important for the establishment of PEM fuel cells into the competitive market world are taken in consideration. The analysis is carried out for the selected materials like Aluminium, Copper and Stainless steel on considering the design and operational parametric conditions of the PEM fuel cell. The aluminium bipolar plate exhibits improved uniformity in the dispersion of hydrogen, oxygen, and water vapour, which will improve the ionic conductivity in the membrane. After analysing the data, we found that the aluminium bipolar plate material had the best temperature distribution in the fuel cell and the lowest pressure loss when compared to the copper and stainless steel materials. Therefore, due to its light weight and reasonably low price of material, aluminium serpentine bipolar plate material may be thought of as the ideal bipolar plate material, especially for portable applications.

Page No: 734 - 741

References:

1. Achenbach, E. (1994). Three-dimensional and time-dependent simulation of a planar solid oxide fuel cell stack. Journal of Power Sources, 49, 333-348.
2. W.L. Worrell, C. Wang, 12th International Conference on Solid State Ionics, Halkidiki, Greece, June, 1999, p. 143, Extended Abstract B-KE-03.
3. S.P.S. Badwal, F.T. Ciacchi, J. Drennan, S. Rajendran, Solid State Ionics 109 (1998) 167
4. Mekhilef, S., Saidur, R., & Safari, A. (2012). Comparative study of different fuel cell technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 981-989.
5. Jiang, Y., & Virkar, A. V. (2001). A high performance, anode-supported solid oxide fuel cell operating on direct alcohol. Journal of Electrochemical Society, 148(7), A706- A709.
6. Karishma Maheshwari, Dr. Sarita Sharma, Dr. Ashok Sharma, Dr. Sanjay Verma, Fuel Cell and Its Applications: A Review, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, Vol. 7 Issue 06, June-2018.
7. J.A.M. van Roosmalen, E.H.P. Cordfunke, Solid State Ionics 52 (1992) 303.
8. Aron Varga, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
9. Marco Sauermoser, Natalya Kizilova, Bruno G. Pollet, Signe Kjelstrup, Flow Field Patterns for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells, Published: 19 February 2020.
10. Lisbona, P., Corradetti, A., Bove, R., & Lunghi, P. (2007). Analysis of a solid oxide fuel cell system for combined heat and power applications under non-nominal conditions. Electrochemical Acta, 53, 1920-1930.
11. European Commission (2004). 2004/8/EC Directive on the promotion of cogeneration based on a useful heat demand in the internal energy market and           amending directive 92/62/EEC.
12. Kattke, K. J., Braun, R. J., Colclasure, A. M., & Goldin, G. (2011). High- fidelity stack and system modelling for tubular solid oxide fuel cell system design and thermal management. Journal of Power Sources, 196, 3790- 3802.
13. Blum, L., Deja, R., Peters, R., & Stolten, D. (2001). Comparison of efficiencies of low, mean and high temperature fuel cell systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 11056-11067.
14. Mekhilef, S., Saidur, R., & Safari, A. (2012). Comparative study of different fuel cell technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 981-989.
15. Kupecki, J., & Badyda, K. (2011). SOFC-based micro-CHP system as an example of efficient power generation unit. Archives of Thermodynamics, 32(3), 33-42. DOE Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Information Center. (2008). Compari‐ son of fuel cell technologies.
16. Mai, A., Sfeir, J., & Schuler, A. (2007). Status of sofc stack and systems development at Hexis. Fuel Cell Seminar 2007 proceedings 5-8.11. 12.
17. Schuler, A., Nerlich, V., Doerk, T., & Mai, A. (2010). Galileo 1000N–status of develop‐ ment and operation experiences. Proceedings of 9th European Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Fo‐ rum, 2, 98.
18. Foger, K. (2010). Commercialisation of CFCL''s residential power station Blugen. Pro‐ ceedings of European Fuel Cell Forum, Lucerne, 2, 22-29.
19. Brennstoffzellenheizgerate fur die Hausenergieversorgung: Die Zukunft der Kraft- Warme- Kopplung. (2008). (2036197-204), VDI-Bericht.
20. Klose, P. (2009). Pre-series fuel-cell-based m-CHP units in their field test phase. In 11th Grove Fuel Cell Symposium. London.
21. Pawlik,   J.,    &    Klaschinsky,    H.    (2008).    Das    Viessmann Brennstoffzellen- Heizgerat. (2036189-196), VDI-Bericht. Toshiyuki Unno JX Nippon personal communication.

How to Cite This Article:
K. Krishna Pandi, K. Ramesh, D. Kulandaivel, M. Shoban Babu .PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A BIPOLAR PLATE IN A FUEL CELL USING COMPUTER FLUID DYNAMICS STUDIES . ijetms;7(3):734-741. DOI: 10.46647/ijetms.2023.v07i03.112