Deriving of ranking of design attributes of branded sports shoes

AUTHOR(S)

Professor (Dr.) M.K.Nair, Assistant Professor (Ms.) Priyanka Lamba

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46647/ijetms.2023.v07i03.115

ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to identify the ranking order of design attributes of branded sports shoes. Total Interpretive Structural Method [TISM] method implemented in this study. A one-on-one discussion was conducted to fill the experience survey questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of logical statements includes the choice factors F1-F6 was mentioned by the participants. On the expert’s opinion of logical based statements, the level partition developed to find out the design attributes hierarchy. There are six iteration process took place to arrive the final hierarchy of design attributes.

Page No: 756 - 763

References:

Chitturi.R, (2015). Design for affect: a core competency for the 21st century. Growth from Knowledge Marketing Intelligence Review (GFKMIR) Vol. 7.(2), Pp 17 – 21.
Creusen, Mairelle E.H. and Jan P. L. Schoormans. (2005). The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. The journal of product innovation management. Vol. 22, Pp 63-81.
Henrik Hagtvedt., Patric V.M.  (2014). Consumer response to over styling: Balancing aesthetics and functionality in product design. Journal of psychology and marketing. Vol. 3, Pp 518-525.
Midgley, David. F. (1977). Innovation and new product marketing, New York, John wile and Sons. Ins. Pp 17.
Morgando E.M., (1995). Extending the analysis of key issues in information technology management” Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Information systems. Amsterdam, Netherlands, December. Pp 13-216.
Nussbaum, Bruce. (1994). Hot product: Smart design is the common thread, Journal of product innovation management. Vol. 11, Pp 78 – 79.
Schmitt Bernad H. and Alex Simonson. (1997). Marketing aesthetics: The strategic management of brands. Identity and image. New York: press. Pp, 2 – 18.
Omotoyo Oeniyi. (2009). Analysis of Nigerian consumer’s perception of foreign products. University petrol. Vol. LXI, StiinteEconomice. Seria. Pp 18 – 26.
Overmars, S., & Poels, K. (2015). A touching experience: Designing for touch sensations in online retail environments. International Journal of Design, 9(3), 17-31.
Sushil (2005).  Interpretive matrix: a tool to aid interpretation of management in social research”, Global Journal of Flexible System Management. Vol; 1., No. 1. Pp 22-32.
Tyas Ajeng Nastiti, S.T (2016). Study of Visual Perception of Woman Shoes for Product’s Design Reference Case Study: Online Small Medium Enterprise, International Journal of Management and Applied Science, 2394-7926 Volume-2, Issue-9. Pp 67-72.
Tantia and Priti Krishnan, (2009) IBSCDC.  Reebok vs Nike in India: Reebok’s covert marketing strategies. www.ibscdc.org. pp 1 – 6.
Veryzer R.W. (1995). The place of product design and aesthetics in consumer research. Advances in consumer research. Vol. 22, Pp. 641 – 645.
Warfield. J.N. (1974). Towards interpretation of complex structural models” IEEE Transactions: Man and Cybernetics, Vol.4 No. 5, pp. 405- 417.

How to Cite This Article:
Professor (Dr.) M.K.Nair, Assistant Professor (Ms.) Priyanka Lamba .Deriving of ranking of design attributes of branded sports shoes . ijetms;7(3):756-763. DOI: 10.46647/ijetms.2023.v07i03.115