The Relationship Between Conformity and Comprehensive Thinking Styles Among Emerging Adults

AUTHOR(S)

Milan Togy George, Kanjirathinkal Sen Johnson, Anandu S. Nair, Tom George Kalayilparampil, Krupa Dinah Mathews

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46647/ijetms.2023.v07i04.078

ABSTRACT
Conformity, a pervasive social phenomenon, refers to the tendency of individuals to adjust their beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours to match those of a majority or authoritative group. It is a type of social influence that involves altering one's beliefs or actions in order to blend in with the group. On the other hand, comprehensive thinking styles involve analytical and integrative cognitive approaches that prioritise thorough examination and independent evaluation of information. The primary objective of this study is to explore whether there exists a connection between an individual's propensity to conform and their preference for comprehensive thinking styles. It seeks to identify the underlying cognitive mechanisms that drive conformity behaviour and determine whether these mechanisms are compatible with comprehensive thinking patterns or in tension with them. This study examines the relationship between comprehensive thinking style and conformity. The sample data consisted of 145 emerging and budding adults who fall between the age of 18 to 25. These participants were from different colleges. The tools used in the study are Conformity Scale (CS) and Comprehensive Thinking Style Questionnaire (CTSQ). Data were analysed using SPSS. Spearman Rho correlation was used to find the correlation. The findings showed that there is a significant positive relationship between comprehensive thinking styles and conformity (p<0.01). The result also showed a positive correlation between conformity and one of the subscales of comprehensive thinking styles, i.e. preference for effortful thinking.
Page No: 574 - 579

References:
Price, E., Ottati, V., Wilson, C., & Kim, S. (2015). Open-Minded Cognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(11), 1488–1504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215600528
Newton, C., Feeney, J., & Pennycook, G. (2023). On the Disposition to Think Analytically: Four Distinct Intuitive-Analytic Thinking Styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722311548. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231154886
Song, G., Ma, Q., Wu, F., & Li, L. (2012). The Psychological Explanation of Conformity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40(8), 1365–1372. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.8.1365
Tang, J., Wu, S., & Sun, J. (2013). Confluence. Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Published. https://doi.org/10.1145/2487575.2487691
Dewi, D. K., Solichah, N., Cahyaningsih, R. O., & Putri, A. B. P. (2019). The Conformity Profile of Higher Education Students. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2019). Published. https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-19.2019.60
Walters, K. S. (1987). Critical thinking and the danger of intellectual conformity. Innovative Higher Education, 11(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00889767

How to Cite This Article:
Milan Togy George, Kanjirathinkal Sen Johnson, Anandu S. Nair, Tom George Kalayilparampil, Krupa Dinah Mathews . The Relationship Between Conformity and Comprehensive Thinking Styles Among Emerging Adults . ijetms;7(4):574-579. DOI: 10.46647/ijetms.2023.v07i04.078