International Journal Of Engineering Technology And Management Sciences

AUTHOR(S)

Naveen R, Parthasarathi S, Tharunkumar R, Nandhakumar G

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46647/ijetms.2023.v07i01.005

ABSTRACT
Smart wearable gadgets are powerful in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) prevention. However, elements figuring out their recognition are poorly understood. This systematic evaluation pursuits to observe the literature on affected person and issuer views of clever wearable gadgets in DFU prevention. The methodological pleasant of the research ranged from low to moderate. Two research hired a quantitative have a look at layout and centered at the affected person perspective, whereas three research blanketed a mixed, quantitative/qualitative layout and explored affected person or provider (podiatrist) perspectives. Four research targeted on an insole gadget and one covered a clever sock device. The quantitative research validated that gadgets had been comfortable, properly designed and beneficial in stopping DFU. One combined layout observe suggested that sufferers did now no longer intend to undertake an insole tool in its cutting-edge layout due to malfunctions, a loss of consolation and alert intrusiveness, regardless of the overall notion that the tool became a beneficial device for foot threat monitoring. Two mixed design studies found that performance expectancy was a predictor of a podiatrist’s behavioral intention to recommend an insole device in clinical practice. Disappointing player studies negatively impacted the podiatrists’ purpose to undertake a clever device. The modern proof approximately affected person and issuer views on clever wearable generation is restrained via way of means of scarce methodological best and conflicting results. It is, thus, now no longer viable to attract definitive conclusions concerning acceptability of those gadgets for the prevention of DFU in human beings with diabetes.

Page No: 23 - 27

References:

1. Btsbioengineering.Availableonline:http://www.btsbioengineering.com/it/prodotti/p-walk/ (accessed on 15 June 2018).
2. Etehadtavakol, M.; Ng, E.Y.K. Assessment of Foot Complications in Diabetic Patients Using Thermography: A Review. In Application of Infrared to Biomedical Sciences; Series in BioEngineering; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 33–43. ISBN 978-981-10-3147-2. [Google Scholar]
3. Ferber, R.; Webber, T.; Everett, B.; Groenland, M. Validation of plantar pressure measurements for a novel in-shoe plantar sensory replacement unit. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2013, 7, 1167–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Hegde, N.; Bries, M.; Sazonov, E. A Comparative Review of Footwear-Based Wearable nSystems. Electronics 2016, 5, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. Hergenroeder AL, Gibbs BB, Kotlarczyk MP, Perera S, Brach JS, Kowalsky RJ: Accuracy and Acceptability of Commercial Grade Physical Activity Monitors in Older Adults. Journal of aging andphysical activity 2018:1-2
6. IEE. Available online: https://www.iee.lu/en/technologies/force-sensing- resistor (accessed on 15 June 2018).
7. Iraj, B.; Khorvash, F.; Ebneshahidi, A.; Askari, G. Prevention of diabetic foot ulcer. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2013, 4, 373–376. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
8. Maximintegrated. Available online: interface/MAX30205.html (accessed on 15 June 2018).
9. Ogurtsova, K.; Da Rocha Fernandes, J.D.; Huang, Y.; Linnenkamp, U.; Guariguata, L.; Cho, N.H.; Cavan, D.; Shaw, J.E.; Makaroff, L.E. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2017, 128, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Yazdanpanah, L.; Nasiri, M.; Adarvishi, S. Literature review on the management of diabetic foot ulcer. World J. Diabetes 2015, 6, 37–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Boulton AJM, Hardisty C, et al. Dynamic foot pressures and other studies as diagnostic and management aids in diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 1983; 6:26-33.
12. Zequera, M.L., Solomonidis, S.E. &, Paul J. (2007), Effectiveness of Moulded Insoles In Reducing Plantar Pressure in Diabetic Patients. Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Proceedings, vol. 2. 71 – 74 pp. Lyon, France
13. O. A. Fawzy et al., “Plantar Pressure as a Risk Assessment Tool for Diabetic Foot Ulceration in Egyptian Patients with Diabetes,” Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes, vol. 7, pp. S17088, 2014.
14. S. Pai, and W. R. Ledoux, “The compressive mechanical properties of diabetic and non-diabetic plantar soft tissue,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1754-1760, Jun. 2010.
15. L. Lavery, E. Peters, and D. Armstrong, “What are the most effective interventions in preventing diabetic foot ulcers?” International wound journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 425–433, 2008

How to Cite This Article:
Naveen R, Parthasarathi S, Tharunkumar R, Nandhakumar G. SMART PREVENTIVE INSOLE FOR DIABETES. ijetms;7(1):23-27. DOI: 10.46647/ijetms.2023.v07i01.005